Sunday, September 14, 2008

Lipstick On A Brick

The hours are fairly crowded these days with real things that must be dealt with, so I thought that I would try and save time and take on two subjects at once (one National, one Local) that seem so simple that they shouldn't even have to be covered.  

Lipstick on a Pig  
No, I don't believe that Sen Obama meant to insult Gov Palin directly by this comment. Anyone who has survived long enough in politics and has gained the office of US Senator can't be stupid enough to think that he could get away with the insult. On the other hand, Sen Obama has proved himself what could best be called impolitic by some of his comments in the past. Pandering to an audience in the Midwest by talking about traditional values, then insulting those values to an audience on the West Coast (clinging to guns and religion) illustrates that the Senator is sometimes more concerned with a good line (what politician isn't?) than good sense or consistency. 

The McCain campaign's immediate retaliatory attack was predictable. While good political strategy (as measured these days), it is just another example of a claim of the very victimization that Gov Palin wants to prove to us she is above. The response has generated a lot of attention, but probably could have been done better. For example: At Gov Palin's next speech, she wipes the lipstick from her face dramatically, laughs lightly, and says, "The Republican Party needs no lipstick to tell Sen Obama and the American people that change is only good if it is change for the better. You can call your change another New Deal or The Great Society, but that won't make it anything other than an expansion of the welfare state."  

The Toledo United Way Building 
This issue continues to be a lively one in Toledo, with a couple of politicians and the newspaper at odds with the owners of the building and some of the other media. 

The owners, United Way, would like to tear a building down that no longer meets code, that they can no longer fill and that they cannot afford to maintain or upgrade, to build a more affordable building on the same site. Those in opposition to this demolition and reconstruction are supported in this effort by some of the local electronic media The Mayor, a county commissioner, and the newspaper. They would like to see the building remain, perhaps with a new owner. They are joined in their effort by a couple of preservation groups (that I at least have never heard of) and the original architect (big surprise there)

In other words, in a city where there are lots of empty buildings, there are some people who want to make sure that one more is added to the list. They would like to prevent the group that had a building designed and built for its use, a building that they still own and which no longer fits that use, from tearing it down and building something in its place that they want and can use. That which they seek to tear down is not on any historical register of buildings, nor is its architectural design of any real significance. Its only claim to fame or survival is that it has been there for a while. Oh yeah, and that some "very important people" want the building to remain.  

What They Say About Us 
The Obama / Palin furor simply points out the continual dumbing down of American Politics, and perhaps America as a whole. Hyper sensitivity to remarks regarding race, gender, and belief systems have taken over honest political debate. People are so wrapped up looking to find offenses that they lose track of the issues being debated. The "Downstream Media", in a feeding frenzy to play some part, exacerbates the situation by endlessly streaming video and soundbites in a 24 hour buffet for our consumption. 

My advise is quitting whining "He hit me first", and get back to the issues. This country is in crisis and we don't need the two choices for our next leader acting like a couple of 6 year-olds (no insult intended to 6 year-olds)

The United Way building points to comparable childish behavior on the local level. Not content to do their own jobs, "important people" in both the public and private sector would like to interfere with everyone else doing theirs. This is almost laughable on the part of elected officials who feel that we can make good choices by putting them in office, but feel that we lose that ability the first time that we disagree with them. And as for the newspaper, you have other things that need your attention. It's not your building that's crumbling around your ears (at least as far as I know), but the business itself. Concern yourself with that if you need something. 

Perhaps the only way to live with these situations (borrowing from both) is to put lipstick on a brick. Maybe the only way to draw enough attention to these as nonsense, idiocy, and hypocrisy is to mix the metaphors. Grow a thicker skin, leave your neighbors to their own business, and stop getting caught up in the petty bullshit people! There are serious times ahead and we need you to focus. 

9 comments:

Ben said...

You wrote, in regards to Palin/Lipstick:

"While good political strategy (as measured these days), it is just another example of a claim of the very victimization that Gov Palin wants to prove to us she is above."

Probably true. I wonder if the Mccain team didnt overplay their hand on that one. I kinda feel they did. People who were actually offended would have picked up on it without it being hammered home by Team McCain.

Timothy W Higgins said...

Ben,

I don't know if they overplayed their hand, but it should be let go of as quickly as possible. Conservatives aren't victims, and that's where they have Gov Palin. At the same time, the more Obama whines about it, the less presidential he looks. He too needs to let it go and move on.

Roland Hansen said...

Gee, are porkbellies or pork barrels the result of lipstick on a pig???
All I really know is that "I got lipstick on my collar." What a great song that was!

Roland Hansen said...

This whole election campaign is all bricks and ballbats. Overall, it seems as though this is the worst presidential campaign in many a year.

Timothy W Higgins said...

Roland,

If you have lipstick on your collar, it better be the misses. :-)

As for the result, you called it. Why is it though, that we seem to be able to say that each succeeding election is the worst? Why also are we even discussing this when the two candidates promised to play nice? Could it be the both are already failing to keep promises?

Roland Hansen said...

Why is it though, that we seem to be able to say that each succeeding election is the worst? Why also are we even discussing this when the two candidates promised to play nice? Could it be the both are already failing to keep promises?

That's it exactly!

Ben said...

Right, Tim.

Dont play the victim line,

glasshouse said...

Why is it more people aren't seriously looking at a third party candidate who promises to upohold the constitution. What reason is there for the two parties to play nice, or make real change when the electorate continues to put one of them in office and the other in congress?

Timothy W Higgins said...

glasshouse,

In a perfect world (or at least one as the Founding Fathers defined it) there would probably be more of us doing so. I am probably more libertarian in my thinking than anything else, and continue to applaud their efforts. Until that thrid party becomes better organized on a national level however, we play the cards dealt us.

McCain and Obama are the front runners and most likely to be elected. That may be a sad reality, but reality it is.