I started to do some research for an effort about the cost of higher education this week; concerned about the $1 trillion dollars in student loan debt, yet another politically motivated debate on a program that is little more than federally funded 'price fixing' where interest rates on college loans are concerned, and disquiet that the price of a college education might be rising far faster than the national rate of inflation would predict. College tuition seems to be the issue de jour in politics these days, as the campaigns vie for student votes in an election year; and as a consequence, the obligatory pandering to their suffering is currently going on.
In fact, according to this ABC piece, tuition costs rose in last year at a level of 8.3% (for at least one type of college), while the inflation rate was only 3.6%. ABC was even kind enough to break the numbers down for all of us, so I highlighted them for you here below:
(These numbers reflect costs per semester, and therefore double as an annual tuition cost. Note that I did not include costs associated with living on campus that were available in this piece, as they are not 'tuition' costs, and for reasons which will quickly become apparent.)
When I looked at these numbers, a couple of things struck me however. First, that the greatest increase in percentage was in in-state tuition a public universities, though the dollar amount itself didn't seem life threatening. Second, that most of the other increases were pretty much in keeping with the inflation rate, give or take a point or two. Third, that the 'choice' of a for-profit university can get pricey in a hurry; and that looking at out-of-state tuition or that of a private non-profit school could get downright expensive.
There was something about that first number that kept nagging at me however, and I was forced to continue digging through old notes and efforts until I discovered why this was. What I discovered not only took me aback, but changed the direction of this piece entirely.
Having grown up and attended schools in both the suburbs and city of Chicago, it was rediscovering the numbers that I had once read about the place of my birth that now began to haunt me. Rather than bore you with trying to explain them, I have cut and pasted the requisite graph and chart below in order to simplify.
|2010 money spent on K-12 education in three areas of Chicago as provided by the district and as actually spent.|
It seems apparent that it's in fact not the cost of higher education that's too high, unless those demanding more funding for K-12 education are likewise willing to concede that the mostly failed effort of a government-controlled education system is in fact also too high (something that I would gladly do). It also seems that such a sum should be more than enough to cover communicating basic learning skills to 5 thru 17 year-olds if it's enough to educate a college student. One might even go further, and say it's logical to conclude that many more might be able to afford to pay the higher education bill for their children (as they have a K-12 education), if they weren't already paying taxes for someone else's child's education at the same time (you know much as parents whose children attend private schools do for others every day).
Yet another lesson exists for those who view such numbers as these and still choose expensive for profit universities, out-of-state, or private schools. The vastly greater funds you will spend on tuition can teach you a different and valuable lesson that most of us learned outside of the classroom and far more cheaply; that while either will get you where you're going, a Cadillac costs more than a Chevy (unless of course, it's a 'Volt').
As for those whose four year education has earned them little more than a place in the unemployment line, perhaps it was not the cost of their education that was the problem, but the value of what they 'chose' to learn while obtaining it.